L'information
qui a été donnée peut être en rapport avec les récents débats qui ont eu lieu au parlement japonais, et les déclarations du
ministre de la défense. de tels briefings seront probablement étendus aux responsables des grands médias qui seront amenés
à couvrir plus largement le phénomène OVNI...
Un article du Dr. Michael E. Salla, fondateur de l'Exopolitics
Institute
Traduction :
"Je viens de recevoir un email de deux collègues en lesquels j'ai toute confiance (Clay
et Shawn Pickering) : une source les informe qu'une réunion secrète s'est tenue le 12 février (2008), au bureau des Nations-Unies
de New York, motivée par les récentes manifestations d'Ovnis. Il semble qu'un certain nombre de pays soient préoccupés par
l'impact d'une augmentation de tels phénomènes et souhaitent être tenus informés de ce qui se passe.
Leur source,
qui fait actuellement partie du corps diplomatique, a du se rendre à New York pour participer à cette réunion matinale
et confidentielle. Cette même source leur a révélé qu'il existe un groupe secret de travail sur les Ovnis, qui a consenti
à ce que cette information soit diffusée afin que le public soit progressivement acclimaté aux évènements qui se préparent.
La date de 2013 a été indiquée comme étant celle d'une divulgation officielle et/ou le moment choisi par les extraterrestres
pour se manifester sans ambiguïté. Dans l'intervalle, des informations visant à cette acclimatation seront diffusées. Il est
important de noter que cette source a révélé que les évènements conduisant à une divulgation officielle impliqueront des extraterrestres
qui ont une attitude éthique, et ils ne constitueront pas une menace militaire."
"L'information qui a été donnée peut
être en rapport avec les récents débats qui ont eu lieu au Parlement japonais, et les déclarations du Ministre de la Défense
sur la manière dont le Japon pourrait avoir à répondre à des extraterrestres venant se manifester pacifiquement dans l'espace
aérien japonais.
Il semble que différents pays se mobilisent en ce moment pour mettre au points des stratégies de
réponse à une exposition croissante des extraterrestres. Alors, si notre information est correcte, nous risquons de voir d'autres
gouvernements prononcer des déclarations officielles allant dans ce sens. On peut s'attendre à ce que les parlementaires,
un peu partout dans le monde, commencent à recevoir des briefings qui les aideront à formuler des résolutions au sujet de
la vie extraterrestre.
De tels briefings seront probablement étendus aux responsables des grands médias qui seront
amenés à couvrir plus largement le phénomène OVNI tel le Larry King Live.
En prélude à la divulgation de la vie extraterrestre,
on pourrait voir circuler quelques informations concernant des technologies maintenues secrètes depuis plus de 50 ans, relatives
à l'antigravité. Notre source a fait allusion à la possibilité de suicides, et ça peut concerner tous ceux qui réaliseront
assez durement qu'on leur a menti durent toute leur existence. Le Rapport Brookings de 1961 a évoqué le fait que les scientifiques
seraient probablement les plus vulnérables au moment de la divulgation de la vie extraterrestre, parce que ça devrait rendre
caduques bon nombre de leurs théories et paradigmes.
En résumé, il semble qu'un compte à rebours ait commencé, qui
mènera à une divulgation officielle autour de 2013, et que l'information va commencer à se diffuser auprès des pays et au
sein des Nations-Unies. Le processus d'acclamation va s'accélérer dans le cours des cinq prochaines années, tandis que les
manifestations OVNIS vont aller en augmentant tout autour du globe, obligeant les gouvernements à faire des déclarations publiques
au sujet des OVNIS et de la vie Extraterrestre.
Source : http://exopolitics.org
Confirmation & Update on Secret United Nations Meeting
Discussing UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life
I recently circulated an article describing a secret meeting that allegedly occurred at the New York office
of the United Nations discussing UFOs/extraterrestrial life. The confidential source (A) for the meeting is presently working
as a member of the diplomatic community who relayed this information to two New York based researchers, Shawn and Clay Pickering.
I am pleased to announce that I have received independent confirmation that the alleged meeting did occur on the morning of
February 12, 2008 as Clay's and Shawn's source claimed. I was also given information by an independent source (B), who I believe
is very reliable, on what transpired at the meeting. It was claimed that a document had been circulated at the meeting, and
was now being relayed to key ministries of many nations for further study and comments.
I have yet to witness the document which allegedly refers to an offer by
extraterrestrials to help prepare humanity for the disclosure of extraterrestrial life. The meeting also apparently discussed
how the UN was being encouraged to take a proactive stand on the release of secret technologies that will enable the development
of free energy. The date 2013 was given as the time when extraterrestrials would unambiguously appear. This was consistent
with the date given in my earlier article. I will share more information on the alleged document circulated at the UN meeting
and the independent source (B) confirming the meeting in my next communication on this unfolding UN initiative on UFOs/extraterrestrial
life.
What follows next is a report of a further meeting between Clay and Shawn
Pickering and their confidential source (A) regarding the UN meeting on UFOs held on the morning of February 12, 2008. They
pointed out that the "unambiguous showing up" of extraterrestrial life - sitting over major cities - would occur in 2017,
rather than 2013 as described in the earlier article. The role of religion and population growth was also allegedly discussed,
and appeared to raise many issues at the meeting, especially for India.
A significant descriptive term chosen by source A for the extraterrestrials
that would show up in 2017 was "The Controllers." Such a term has clear psychological connotations and was chosen to have
a particular effect on the target audience - both UN member states in attendance and the general public to which the information
was being leaked. This is a clue that source A is conveying information that has been designed to trigger a certain psychological
reaction that influences how issues are framed and discussed.
Another aspect of the following report is that it was claimed that India
would have a difficult time processing disclosure of extraterrestrial life, possibly leading to the elimination of Hinduism.
This appears inconsistent with India's long tradition of advanced technologies and extraterrestrial life in its Vedic texts,
and multiplicity of gods. If, as the confidential source claims, that Roman Catholics will have an easier time with disclosure
due to the belief of "three Gods in one", so too might a religion like Hinduism which has a multiplicity of gods and is very
eclectic.
I believe that the mention of India as a country that might experience
disclosure problems is likely a fabrication intended to confuse disclosure related issues. When combined with the use of the
descriptive term for extraterrestrials, "The Controllers" designed to trigger a particular psychological reaction and lead
discussions in a certain direction, the possibility that the information is being relayed through an intelligence agency with
expertise in psychological operations cannot be discounted. In the earlier message (February 13), Clay's and Shawn's confidential source (A) referred to an Admiral who was
the ultimate authority for disclosure of the UN meeting to UFO/exopolitical community. Is this evidence that the Office of
Naval Investigations is involved in the UFO disclosure initiative at the UN, or at least filtering information to be released
to the UN and general public?
Most interesting for me was contrasting the agenda of the meeting revealed
by Clay's and Shawn's confidential source (A) , and what I had been told by my independent source (B) who confirmed the UN
meeting had occurred. Source B focused on issues concerning the release of restricted technologies for new energy sources
and a document for feedback, while source A focused on population growth and religion. Curiously, source A did not mention
any document being circulated to UN member states for feedback.
In conclusion, I am now satisfied that a meeting took place at the UN headquarters
in New York of February 12 to discuss the issue of UFOs and extraterrestrial. What transpired at the meeting itself appears
to differ according to the confidential source (A) Clay and Shawn have cited, and the independent source (B) used to confirm
the meeting. The emergence of the alleged document circulated at the meeting and relayed to key ministries of other nations
will help considerably in clarifying what was discussed and the accuracy of these respective sources. The possible role of
the Office of Naval Intelligence in filtering information that is being related through source A is something that cannot
be discounted when considering what was specifically discussed at the UN meeting. I look forward to reviewing any documents
circulated at the meeting to get a better idea of the agenda issues discussed involving the role the UN would play in public
disclosure of extraterrestrial life.
Aloha,
Michael E. Salla, Ph.D Kona, Hawaii 2/20/08 www.Exopolitics.Org
----- Original Message ---- From: Shawn and Clay <xxx@yahoo.com> To:
drsalla@exopolitics.org Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:21:17 AM Subject: Follow up of source's UFO meeting at
the UN
Dear Michael,
This email is a follow up of the UN meeting which
took place Tuesday 12, 2008 at 8;00AM. We met our source 7:00PM, Monday, February 18, 2008. Our source stated the following:
1)
The meeting went well; however, our source left with a degree of frustration.
2) The meeting covered various topics.
The issue of recent UFO sightings was one of many topics discussed.
3) Security around the meeting was intense.
4)
Everyone was searched. Pens, pins, key chain items were collected and not allowed in the meeting room. There were multiple
security checkpoints. UN security cards were confiscated upon entering the room.
5) 50 to 60 people attended. Everyone
was in civilian dress, except one Russian.
6) Other countries may have had military there, but they came under their
respective civilian titles.
7) UFO topic was addressed. The Russians are very paranoid about the west. Putin is
not very trusting. This frustrated our source greatly. Our source believes the Russians will eventually come around; "They
always come back to the table." This mistrust appears to be an ongoing issue between East & West.
8) The religious
implications of contact came up during the meeting. It turned into a 20 minute debate. Our source had to reel it in and
refocus the meeting. It seems that the Indians are very difficult to deal with on this issue of the religious implications regarding
contact. Population is a major factor in how nation-states deal with a new paradigm. The Indian's world view has led to
an unsustainable food, energy and water demand. Source stated that the world must gets its population and resource use under
control. ET will help, but we must show them that we intend to live within our constraints. If we don't show some semblance
of intent, they simply will not help.
9) Source said the 2013 date of official contact is wrong. That is the date when
things heat up. The real date of contact is 2017. It is on this date when very large craft will appear above cities
and sit. There will be NO use of force; they will just sit there. Source stated the "Independence Day" film was close,
but their ships are not that big and, again, no use of force will occur. Our source cannot reveal his source for the 2017 date.
His source is very high up in the government/military/intelligence structure.
10) Source stated that it is our choice
how we embrace this contact.
11) The ET's who will arrive on 2017 are referred to as "The Controllers." They are a
"galactic federation" type group; however, "galactic federation" is not the real name for their group--it is hypothetical
name used as a reference.
12) The controllers have a keen sense of freedom and free will. They will not intervene and
help humanity if humanity does not show them we want their help. If some entropic event happens (nuclear war), the controllers
will not make contact. "This is something they will not tolerate," our source stated.
13) The controllers will
not give us technology to expand our ability to feed ourselves if we do not recognize the necessity to stabilize our population
growth. They don't want our planet's population to double because of a technological innovation seeded by them. Our
source used India as an example, " India has over 1 billion people. It is clearly a country out of balance in terms of
its population size."
14) A contentious moment in the meeting had to do with the religious implications of contact.
It is this issue which is of most concern. Our source stated that the more secular societies will adjust more easily to
contact than the fundamentalist. He stated, " The Roman Catholic countries will not have a rough time, except for the population
problem; the Roman Catholics already have three Gods in one, so accepting others is not that much of a stretch. The
dividing point is going to be the containment of population. The Protestant countries will deal fairly easily with contact.
So will countries with indigenous religions connected to nature. The Muslim, Hindu, and fundamentalist Christian religions
will have the most difficult time, possibly even the elimination of said religions; we can expect mass suicides, social
unrest and upheaval. The ETs will help with re-programming and the concept of an inclusive galactic order. However,
society will have to step up to the plate to assist - one on one - those people who have shattered belief systems The Chinese
will have no problem because of the Buddhist and Taoist influences."
Clay and Shawn Pickering
|